This just may be one of the most important letters you will ever read.

    The identities of the individuals involved in the conversation will not be disclosed by their own request. The original letter came via Lorie Kramer -  through her website which is an open forum with direct observation postings from thousands across the country:  Eric Strider/Wolf Report On-LineNews

Chemtrail Tracking USA: http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/chemtrailtrackingusa

“ Letter from a friend ”

Date:  Wed Nov 27, 2002  9:24 pm
Subject:  I asked a friend, who asked a relative, who knew a person who....

Ok, this is a long one. I just became aware of the problem in our
skies, and to tell the truth I have read all sorts of theories, from
anti terrorist things to the take over of some super government.

Since all of these options lay open, I contacted a friend who has a
relative who... Well you get the picture. I do not know how truthful
this is, but the email I received this evening includes the following:

**************************************

Do you really want to know what is going on? It isn't pretty, and it
is far worse than the imagined evils that have been attributed to so
called `Chemtrails'.

The truth of the matter is that the Earth is dieing.

Since the Start of the Industrial Revolution, about 200 years ago,
mankind has been dumping pollutants into the air in greater and
greater amounts. Though many developed industrial nations have become
aware of what was happening and that the atmosphere could only hold
so much, I fear that the emerging industrial nations are behind the
times when it comes to reduced emissions.

All of these pollutants have been adding up over time, by the mid
20th century when we started fully understanding the implications of
what we were doing by the symptoms and signs given even then, it was
too late to do much to advert disaster.

Even if we had cut back our emissions to near nil, we still would
have suffered through the UV Summer caused by the depleted Ozone
layer. All of those CFCs and other Ozone destroying gasses were still
in the lower atmosphere, it takes a few years for them to reach the
Ozone layer thus when we discovered the holes in the ozone, it was
already to late to stop further damage.

The UV Summer started back in 1990-92 - it its growing worse
exponentially, in a few years UV levels will be high enough to cause
serious ecological disaster which will have a direct impact on crops.
Presently we would have nearly 30% more cases of skin cancer if
nothing had been done.

Another side effect of all the pollutants is the Green House effect a
very real problem that I fear we under estimated several years ago.
In early 1993 a few events took place which showed that Global
Warming was speeding up, meaning that the earlier estimates which had
a 2'F global warming in 50 years was far off the mark, more like 20
years.

We, mankind and the industry that supports us, made a terrible,
costly mistake. We waited to too long to change our ways.

In the 1980's a conference was joined together of many scientists and
military brass. In closed, Top Secret meetings everything and I mean
everything was placed on the table. The general information is in the
public domain; however, it is policy to stress the optimistic outlook
for the Future of Earth.

This took place around the time the Wall Fell and the Iron Curtain
came down. These events are directly linked to the secret meetings
that took place. The notion of political boundaries became moot when
faced with extinction. Yes, a few nations till hold back, but these
are the ones who refuse to see very real problems.

Much of the intelligence and the data that was placed on the table
came out of the old Soviet Union. They too had seen the problem and
were concerned. As President Reagan pointed out, it would take an
outside force that threatened humanity as whole to bring about world
peace. Ironically as he spoke those worlds the crises was mounting.

The purposes of the closed-door meetings were to discuss in real
terms what the coming events for earth were. Further, to offer
working immediate solutions and to set up reasonable long-term goals.
When the meetings started it was a fair certainty that something had
to be done it was rather obvious that something was wrong. It wasn't
until the meetings went on that the exact magnitude of the disaster
was understood for the very first time.

 The combined data showed that this generation, our generation

would see the end of life as we know it. A true extinction level 

event that was forecasted to include up to 89% of all species and

 poise a very real threat not only to the existence of our civilization

but our species as well.

The going odds were less than 10% that mankind would survive.

Two major problems faced us; Global Warming and UV Summer.

Global Warming, as you may know, is far more than just a rise in
earth's average temperature, it also includes a rising of sea water,
not only from the melt of the polar ice, but from the expansion of
water when heated.

Take a look at any map of the world and you will quickly note that
the major population centers reside in the coastlands and low lands
of the world. If we allow the seas to rise we would lose all of those
homes. Evacuation of a good chunk of the earths population is not
feasible.

It would also mean that more water vapor would enter into the
atmosphere charging storms with more energy causing greater storm
damage. Heat the Atlantic a few degrees and Hurricanes become
Hypercans, storms of such size and strength that nothing in their
path can survive.

Winters would become far worse, super blizzards that would bury
cities and towns, then afterward would melt into floodwaters.
Increased precipitation worldwide would be seen. Further areas that
had once seen abundant rain would suddenly enter major drought.

Super weather patterns would kill, the droughts would destroy our
ability to feed the 6+ billion people on earth - combined with
coastal and low land flooding our civilization would not survive.

Venice Italy is a prime example of the realities of global warming,
it is flooding much more now than 20 years ago. In recent decades we
have seen large chunks of the Antarctic ice pack break off - large as
Rhode Island.

Alaska and Greenland are showing signs of global warming as well. The
mean average temperature of Earth has increased dramatically - more
than what is reported. It is heating up faster with each passing
year. The more heat that is trapped, the more wide spread and
dramatic the effects are. Look back over the past decade of weather
patterns. One will easily see the impact of Global Warming.

UV Summer is here; it has been here for a while. Without protection
we would be seeing more instances of skin cancer. This problem has
been down played as well, however I am most certain that a
resourceful person can find the real statistics for skin cancer cases
and also real statistics on how much flooding of the coastal regions
is taking place and the number and severity of storms. The evidence
is out there. Buried under controlled skepticism and directed
debunking.

With all of this in mind and with the reality of our future being
very dim indeed, it was decided to do something. Several ideas were
considered. A large solar array placed between the Earth and the Sun,
it would do much to cool the earth, however it would do little to
reduce the poisoning by UV Radiation (As well as other cosmic
radiations that are deflected by the Ozone Layer.

A series of smaller reflective discs placed in Orbit between Sun and
Earth was considered, but the same UV problem would be there.

Detonation of several high yield nuclear weapons was considered as
well, it was thought that the controlled nuclear winter would reduce
the amount of UV and Infrared reaching the surface, however no one
wanted to risk radiation poisoning, and who in their right mind would
willingly detonate nuclear weapons? The outcry from the public would
be intense.

The initial Stratospheric `Shadow' Plan which called for the spraying
of reflective dust combined with other elements that would cause
condensation therefore precipitation was considered, however, this
required spraying in the upper regions of the atmosphere.

Ozone is created by radiation bombardment (mainly UV) of the Oxygen
atom. This is how the Earth has maintained its Ozone Layer for
millions of years. Had we sprayed in that region of the atmosphere it
was feared that the natural production of Ozone would be hampered,
requiring repeated applications over centuries of time.

We were faced with one viable option, and that was to lower the
altitude where seeding would be done.

Many metals and substances were considered. The Stratospheric Seeding
would have used titanium oxide and aluminum oxide conjunction with
silver iodine and other trace metals. The idea was to create a long
lasting umbrella that would reflect sunlight back out into space.

At lower levels in the atmosphere these particles would be inhaled by
organisms this drastically reduce the number of substances that could
have been used. (Note: even at higher altitudes it was feared that
the dust would settle out in time, over generations - the risk of
side effects was far lower than one would imagine)

What is being used is the only combination that will do the job of
adverting ecological disaster while having the least amount of impact
on human and animal life.

It came down to a matter of numbers. Without treatment we faced an
extinction level event. With treatment we see possible survival with
a loss of a few hundred million, possibly 2 billion if one considers
the long-term effects of near constant exposure to the substances
used to create the shield.

It may appear that this is an open and shut case and that if provided
with the choices the human race would agree to this spraying. The
Good of the many far outweighs the good of a few.

Unfortunately there is a little bit more to the picture.

There is a standing need to deal with the problem fast. The greatest
threat to the project was that the arguments and the sideline debates
and the weighing of the pros and cons would drag out until it was far
to late for even this extreme measure.

Remember that all of this was being done During the Clinton
Administration. Look back at that period of time and you will find
that there were a few stage shows put on world wide to entertain and
pull attention away from the ecological problems we faced.

Trust me, Clinton really didn't have sex with that woman. But he did
agree to have his name dragged through the mud to pull the attention
to him.

Several other events took place, which were staged as well, all of
which were designed to keep the masses busy.

There are a few opponents to the shield project. They made their
presence felt on 9-11-01. No, it wasn't the Taliban or Bin Laden who
caused these events, it was those who are opposed and are fighting
the only working solution to an impossible problem.

What is going on has far reaching implications. The general strife we
see today is partially due to the threat that our species faces.
There are those who would rather see nothing done than to have this
project carried out.

If it was revealed just how bad things really are, I assure you, the
ensuing panic would cause greater damage than the suspicious
mumblings that have been heard when it comes to Chem-Trails.

I tell you these things to set the record straight and to impress
upon you the need to refrain from causing panic. The threat to
humanity is not from the planes spraying overhead, but from the
impact that mankind has had on this delicate planet.

Earth is dieing. The program in place is only a stop gap measure. The
more dire estimates tell us that the problem is too far advanced to
stop ecological disaster. The oceans are dieing, the fresh water
supply is depleted, and the very ground in which we grow our crops is
yielding up poisons.

Global Warming and UV Summer are the issues that face us today,
tomorrow we will be looking at famine, thirst and the spread of
disease.

We have forestalled for a few decades the death of our civilization.
It is not a cure; it is not the solution. Unless a miracle takes
place during the next 20 years, mankind and planet earth will die.

Look back at the past two decades of political history to see the
truth of these words. Look at the events as being a result of the
threat that humanity faces. When the Soviet Union folded, it did so
to the amazement of many Do you honestly think that the Soviet Union
folded due to financial problems?

Look at the years of relative peace we have enjoyed, do you think
that all of these nations who were once at each other's throat
decided to set aside their differences magically?

The fast development of the European Union is another sign of the
times. A United Europe has never been possible before, but suddenly
it is not only possible, but happening.

A friend

Date:  Mon Dec 2, 2002  2:42 pm

Subject:  More From A Friend - Answer to Questions

I took the Four questions asked from a participant here and I also

added a few of my own. i sent off my questions the day before

Thanksgiving, Today I got a reply.

Here it is:

Having read your email, I must say that you are full of questions.

These questions I would dismiss immediately as being the frustrated

attempts of fringe groups to bring a halt to the project, however

these reports of biological material being part of the spray should

be addressed. Therefore I will give as much attention to all of your

questions as possible

 1. What purpose do polymer threads imbedded with biological

material serve in this scenario?

Polymers are part of the mixture and they do form in threads and

in `tufts'. The idea is simple and comes to us from the

spider.

As you may know spider webbing is very light, some newborn spiders

spin a `parachute' to catch the prevailing breeze to travel

far from

their place of birth. Spiders have been able to attain high altitudes

and travel great distances for long periods of time.

Most of the elements used in the spray are heavier than air, even in

their powdered form they are heavier and will sink quickly. Mixing

them with the polymers suspends the particles in the atmosphere high

above the surface for longer periods of time, therefore in theory we

do not need to spray as often or as much material.

Since the suspended particles eventually do settle into the lowest

part of the atmosphere and are inhaled by all life forms on the

surface there is an attempt to counter the growth of mold by adding

to the mixture mold growth suppressants - some of which may be of

biological material. Mold comes in spores that travel on the winds;

the polymers can attract mold spores through static charges created

by the friction of the polymer threads and the atmosphere. Add a bit

of warmth and moisture and mold begins to grow.

The polymer is stored in a liquid form as two separate chemicals.

When sprayed they combine behind the plane `spinning' long polymer

chains (threads). Much tinkering has been done which the chemical

 matrix in past years. Many polymers (plastics) are non-biodegradable

thus add to the problem of pollution. Various formula have been used,

 some which even use biological agents.

It would be great if we could reproduce the same web material that

 spiders make, it is extremely strong, extremely lightweight and breaks

 down relatively fast in the ecology.

 2. If this spraying is to mitigate global warming, why does so

much of it take place at night?

Though it would appear that the dispersal rate of the spray is fast,

it is actually takes much longer to be an effective shield. There is

a desired concentration being sought. One that is thick enough to

stem the UV and the Infrared, while being thin enough to allow

visible light through. A perpetual cloud cover would have disastrous

effects on plant life; the food chain thus disrupted would soon

collapse. The desired effect wanted is a thin cover that would

theoretically create a daytime haze that allows plenty of sunlight

while providing protection. From UV radiation and also reflect enough

infrared to maintain nominal temperatures.

The optimal condition is to use the least amount of material to

provide the maximum amount of shielding. Ideally that would be a one-

time application which would stay suspended for years, however, as

noted, barium and aluminum and other trace elements are far heavier

than air and they sink rather rapidly.

The different temperatures between day and night causes massive

volumes of air to rise during the night, the warm air trapped at the

surface rises above the cooling air above. By strategically spraying

in certain areas at night, we get the advantage of the rising air,

which not only pushes the material higher, but also causes the

material to disperse into a thin layer. I would suggest studying on

the subject of weather, namely highs and lows and how air moves to

fully understand the times of spraying.

I note, it is not just global warming we are combating here, we are

also combating UV Summer. Global warming could effectively be treated

by applications during the night, when the warm air rises. However

the UV needs to be treated during the day. This is why on some days

one finds that more spraying is done during the day. The UV indexes

are monitored constantly for local areas.

If the problem were simply cooling the earth, rockets would have been

used to suspend particles in the high atmosphere. However the

delicate nature of the Ozone Layer precludes this method of

shielding. More on this in the answer to Question 6.

 3. What other military programs are in place involving the

spraying of barium and what are their purposes?

Do you know and understand the chemical make up of the element? A

little knowledge will go a long way to understanding the need to use

barium:

Barium is often used in barium-nickel alloys for spark-plug

electrodes and in vacuum tubes as a drying and oxygen-removing agent.

Barium oxidizes in air, and it reacts vigorously with water to form

the hydroxide, liberating hydrogen. In moist air it may spontaneously

ignite. It burns in air to form the peroxide, which produces hydrogen

peroxide when treated with water. Barium reacts with almost all of

the nonmetals; all of its water-soluble and acid-soluble compounds

are poisonous.

Barium carbonate is used in glass, as a pottery glaze,

and as a rat poison. Chrome yellow (barium chromate) is used as a

paint pigment and in safety matches. The chlorate and nitrate are

used in pyrotechnics to provide a green color. Barium oxide strongly

absorbs carbon dioxide and water; it is used as a drying agent.

Barium chloride is used in medicinal preparations and as a water

softener.

Barium sulfide phosphoresces after exposure to light; it is

sometimes used as a paint pigment. Barite, the sulfate ore, has many

industrial uses. Because barium sulfate is virtually insoluble in

water and acids, it can be used to coat the alimentary tract to

increase the contrast for X-ray photography without being absorbed by

the body and poisoning the subject.

Note what Barium Oxide can do, absorb carbon dioxide - one of the

chief gasses causing the green house effect.

In my answer to Question 4 I will discuss the need to carry a current

in the shield. I would like to point out that barium and aluminum

work together to diffuse and strengthen an electrical charge.

Somewhat like the current produced when acid is introduced between

two dissimilar metals, such as iron and copper.

There are military applications for everything you can think of, can

not a butter knife be used as a weapon?

The same concept holds true here.

 4. What is the connection between ELF, EMF, VLF and Chemtrails

spraying? Or is there one?

To understand the use of radio waves in the shield, one first

understands how ozone is created. I cannot stress to you how dire the

situation really is. The shield in place is only a partial solution;

we must counter the depletion of the ozone- this means we must make

ozone in the stratosphere.

 Ozone at ground levels does no good; indeed, ozone pollution at ground levels it what is used to determine the air quality. Higher levels of ground level ozone mean that air quality is bad.

Pure ozone is an unstable, faintly bluish gas with a characteristic

fresh, penetrating odor. The gas has a density of 2.144 grams per

liter at standard temperature and pressure.

Below its boiling point (-112°C) ozone is a dark blue liquid;

below its melting point (-193°C) it is a blue-black crystalline solid.

Ozone is triatomic oxygen, O3, and has a molecular weight of 47.9982

atomic mass units (amu). It is the most chemically active form of

oxygen.

 It is formed in the ozone layer of the stratosphere by the

action of solar ultraviolet light on oxygen. Although it is present

in this layer only to an extent of about 10 parts per million, ozone

is important because its formation prevents most ultraviolet and

other high-energy radiation, which is harmful to life, from

penetrating to the earth's surface. Ultraviolet light is absorbed

when its strikes an ozone molecule; the molecule is split into atomic

and diatomic oxygen: 03+ ultraviolet light -  0+02. Later, in the

presence of a catalyst, the atomic and diatomic oxygen reunite to

form ozone.

Ozone is also formed when an electric discharge passes through air;

for example, it is formed by lightning and by some electric motors

and generators. Ozone is produced commercially by passing dry air

between two concentric-tube or plate electrodes connected to an

alternating high voltage; this is called the silent electric

discharge method.

Since UV radiation is the problem, we can not use UV to produce more

stratospheric ozone. Another method must be found.

The shield acts like one plate of the electrode, when tickled with

certain radio waves; it produces an opposite charge to stratospheric

layers producing low atmosphere to stratosphere lightening. Creating

Ozone where it is needed.

 5. If this is being done for the reasons you say, then why are

other chemicals being used, why are different sprays being used?

Correcting the ecological damage that mankind has done has NEVER BEEN

DONE BEFORE.

We are relatively new to this notion of terraforming on a real scale.

That is what we are doing, Terraforming. We are trying to recreate

the ideal life sustaining conditions on a dieing planet. We have

never done this before, not intentionally. We are testing and trying

different methods.

Granted, if we do nothing 89% of all species will go extinct and

humanity stands a high chance of not surviving through two more

generations (or less). However the idea of 2 billion casualties death

and permanent injury) is not easy to swallow either.

Several attempts to improve the application of Shielding material and

getting the most out of each application are taking place all the

time.

The combined resources of the nations of earth are not enough to

allow constant spraying. Though we have achieved a high level of

technology, there is a great surface area that needs to be covered

nearly daily. Large sections of ocean are all but ignored; the

remaining landmasses are more than what can be covered effectively.

The Shield would work best if it was a single thin layer with out

interruption, however due to the movement of air, weather patterns

and the sad fact that we do not have the means to place ample amounts

of material at the same level at the same time we are getting a small

fraction of the effectiveness from our applications.

6. Why is spraying found before storm fronts? Is it to cause drought?

Before a storm there is a front, the front clears the air before a

storm, pushing particulate matter ahead of it, leaving a space

relatively clear of particulate matter. UV radiation levels rise in

these areas, sometimes to dangerous levels. The shield must be

maintained.

Since barium absorbs water as well as carbon dioxide, precipitation

has been affected. Other kinds of sprays are in development and

testing which may reduce the affects on precipitation. As I stated

above, this is a new technology we are working with, it is still in

its infancy and there are some problems with it.

7. Why are UFO's and disappearing spray planes reported?

I do not know.

8. What about the reports of sickness after spraying?

There are several causatives for this. Some people are more sensitive

to metals, whiles others are sensitive to the polymer chemicals - As

stated in a pervious email, people will get sick, and some will die.

It is estimated that 2 billion worldwide will be affected to some

degree by the spraying. with out spraying we have a 90% + chance of

becoming extinct as a species with in the next 20 years.

9. What is the relationship between these spraying programs and One

World Order?

Personally I am against the move for globalization, and yes, there is

potential to use the Shield to speed up the process of globalization,

there are several countries that are involved in this project:

European Union Nations, USA and Russia are the largest contributors

to the project, many of the allied nations and UN Members participate

to one extent or another. The material (chemical spray as you may

call it) comes from all of these nations. To insure that the

chemicals are not tampered with, they are mixed and sprayed over

random nations. This means that chemicals produced in the USA has a

good chance of being sprayed over Russia, England and the USA. This

random spray of material means that no nation would be certain that

their chemicals will be sprayed over a nation which they have issues

with.

Russian planes may be seen in USA skies, but so too will USA planes

be seen in Russian skies - The canisters used are sealed in a third

nation that has no idea where its canister is going. Participating

nations have their observers at every station where canister loading

is done.

All of this to insure that the shield is not used as a weapon.

To further insure that the shield is not used as a weapon,

nonparticipant nations are sprayed by participants who must spray in

order to get enough material to maintain their nations shield. It is

understood that not spraying is as much a military offense as

shooting at them. Without the shield, UV poisoning would cause great

death.

The threat is a common one, which has brought nations together in

defense. The natural outcome of having a common enemy is to

strengthen international ties - a step toward globalization.

10. Is the Spraying related to terrorism?

Yes and no. Recent terrorist activity can be traced to resistance

groups who feel that we should not interfere with the natural order

of things. As you know, there are many rumors out there as to what

the Shield Program is. Some believe that this is a population

reduction scheme, designed to kill off `undesirable' peoples.

While

others hold that this is a mind control program. There are many

theories which have sinister plots in them these are propagated by

the resistance groups in an attempt to stop the shield regardless of

the consequences.

The same delivery method could be used for biological and chemical

warfare. It could also be used to inoculate large populations, the

effectiveness of these uses are low, there are better methods that

can be used.

As a means to fight terrorism it is ineffectual, it is far easier to

inoculate a population individually and would insure full inoculation

against germ warfare.

11. Why all the secrecy?

Due to the severity of the situation it is mandatory to maintain

public calm for as long as possible.

The Earth is dieing. Humanity is on the road to extinction - without

the Shield mankind will die off with in 20 to 50 years. Most people

alive today could live to see this extinction take place.

This means that an announcement of the situation we face boils down

to telling every man, woman and child on earth that they have no

future, they are going to be killed.

People would panic. There would be economic collapse, the production

and movement of goods would collapse. Millions would die in all

cities on earth, riots and violence would reduce civilian centers to

rubble within days. Half of the population in dense metropolitan

areas would try to leave the cities seeking `safety' in the

rural areas thinking that they would be safe. Those left behind in the

cities would be at war with their neighbors, fighting for the

remaining supplies.

We would be telling the world that the world is coming to an end, and

even with the Shield the chances of survival are small. UV Summer and

Global Warming are the immediate problems we face, there are far

greater problems that are raising their ugly heads and will present

new problems which in some cases have no viable solutions at this

time.

Ecologies are collapsing. The extinction rate of species is climbing.

The amount of chemical pollutants in the water and soil are fast

approaching and in many places has surpassed the earth's ability

to heal itself. Crop failure is on the rise, even in the USA the returns

on crops are smaller than they were 10 years ago. Even with the

advances in genetically altered food crops, we are falling behind in

our ability to produce enough to go around.

Throughout the 20th century chemical fertilizers and pesticides were

used to insure the best yields. Unfortunately many of these have

contaminated ground water , killed beneficial insects along with the

undesirable insects. These chemicals have gotten into the food chain

and are affected other species besides mankind. It is only a matter

of years before famine spreads like a cancer throughout the world.

Clean fresh water is in short supply, in many places well water is

nonpotable, containing the run off of pesticides, herbicides and

fertilizers that have been used on crops and lawns. The water

treatment facilities we have are unable to scrub out all of the

toxins we have placed in the soil and water supply. Many of the

toxins we find build up over time in the body, a long slow poisoning

which has been making its presence felt in many areas of the world in

the form of cancers, leukemia, sterility, birth defects, learning

disorders, immune deficiency problems, etc. These are on the rise,

any good researcher can find the records.

For decades there was public outcry for the end to pollution. For

every small step we made to clean up our production, millions where

born who added to the problem. Yes, pollution is down per individual,

however there are a couple more billion individuals producing

pollution, thus the real numbers have an increase in over all

pollution produced.

Name a city that does not have problems with smog. You would be hard

pressed to find one. Though smog controls on automobiles is higher

than ever before, the number of autos on the road has increased thus

the amount of smog producing pollutants is higher than ever before.

All the clean air acts passed to curb individual factory and auto

emissions did not address the production of more factories and more

autos.

Here an uneasy compromise was made between the need to maintain the

economy against the need to maintain the ecology. The ecology lost

since it was estimated to be a problem decades from now. The economy

was a problem that would have dire effects today.

All of these factors combined have produced a scenario that in shorts

boils down to the end of the world in 50 to 75 years.

Even if we were to stop all emissions of pollution today, the inertia

of past decades is enough to carry us over the brink in 100 years.

However we can not stop the production of pollution, to do so would

mean shutting down every factory, every auto, every train, truck,

ship and every household on the planet.

Electricity is used to heat many homes in the Western World. The

production of electricity produces fewer pollutants than heating all

homes with wood or coal. Cutting our power generation abilities down

to hydroelectric and fission reactors would leave a good chunk of the

world in the dark.

It is an impossible situation, our civilization is geared to the use

of energy, take away our energy and civilization will collapse.

12. When will spraying stop?

There are several factors governing this.

1. Should the Ozone layer repair itself or our active attempts at

repair reduces the amount of ground level UV to acceptable levels,

spraying will stop. Present calculations place this between 2018 and

2024.

2. Should another method be found which is more effective, less

costly or presents us with long-term solutions the Shield project

would be replaced.

3. When the other problems become too big to make the maintenance of

the shield worth the effort. The estimated date for this is 2025 to

2050.

13. Since Global Warming and UV summer are the problem, why is the

Government backing down on its pollution controls?

Because they are ineffectual and will cause more economic problems

than they would solve ecological problems.

We surpassed the threshold of Earth's ability to absorb

pollutants in the 1970's. Since that time the earth's population has nearly

doubled. Emerging Industrial nations have come into being, more

pollutants are produced now than back then, even with the stringent

controls in place.

The world is heading for economic depression, more emission controls

would add to the economic problems. This translates into our being

unable to do anything to start solving the problems. Unfortunately

our technologies require a strong economy to advance. We need that

advancement, we need the trillions of dollars spent on research that

a strong economy causes. Each corporation that produces a product has

a product development program in place. Many of the past products

invented came by accident through other unrelated products.

There is a corporate drive to find methods to clean up the ecology,

to reduce emissions, etc. These goals have been in place for decades,

many of the large corporations are on the know when it comes to the

ecological problems we face thus they are spending a great deal of

money and time on finding solutions to the problems we face.

Take away the economy and their research stops.

14. How are you related to the Chemtrails? How do you know that this

is what is happening?

I would prefer to not state who I am or how I am related to all of

this.

To validate what I say, would require a bit of research on your

behalf. I would recommend the following subjects to look up and study:

A. Population numbers for industrial nations and the tons of

pollutants produced annually. Start with 1975 and work your way up.

B. Number of emerging Industrial Nations.

C. Number of cases of Skin cancers worldwide.

D. Crop Production vs. land area dedicated to crop production. Simple

math will show that more acreage is needed to produce food per

individual

E. Automobile production from 1975 to present, estimated number of

autos on the road and the average emissions of later model cars

produced as compared the emissions of earlier model cars - A little

math will show that though individual autos produce less emissions,

the amount of emissions has risen due to the number of autos on the

road - Remember that many autos are the road that were built before

present emission control standards. 1980 is a cut of date anything

put on the road before then produces more pollutants than autos

produced today. I would include research in the number of diesel

autos produced, diesel has not been under the emissions control acts.

F. Severity of storms and the number of severe storms. Also include

heat waves and droughts in that research, you will find that the

numbers are staggering when compared to data from 1950, 1960 and 1970.

G. Research how naturally occurring Ozone is produced in the

stratosphere. Compare to how it is produced industrially.

H. Research political reforms in the past 30 years, see which

political institutions have changed, which nations have joined with

whom. Concentrate more on these from 1982 onward. This would include

the fall of the Wall and Iron Curtain.

I. Research polymers and how they are made, look at recent research

done in biological polymers, medical polymers and filaments.

J. Check out spiders and spider web and the way spiders use their

different webs and threads.

K. Research clean fresh water estimates as compared to the 1970's

to today - world wide.

L. Research the following medical conditions per capita:

Birth Defects